Appeal No. 1996-3277 Application No. 08/143,373 dispersion of Rawlings et al. so that the deposited iris simulating pattern would remain in a desired position on the mold (ie [sic, i.e.], not run)" (page 4 of Answer). However, as pointed out by appellants' counsel at oral hearing, a thixotropic agent is not a viscosity controlling agent. A thixotropic agent enables colloidal gels to liquify when agitated and to return to the gel-like state when at rest. Hence, even if it were true that it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art to employ a viscosity controlling agent into the dispersion, it does not necessarily follow that it also would have been obvious to utilize the presently claimed thixotropic agent. Also, while the examiner notes that the present specification "indicates that thixotropic agents are conventional in the art" (page 4 of Answer), appellants' specification only acknowledges that thixotropic agents, per se, were known. Appellants do not concede that the use of a thixotropic agent in a dispersion of the type claimed was known in the art at the time of filing the present application. Accordingly, since the examiner has not established the prima facie obviousness of utilizing a thixotropic agent in 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007