Appeal No. 1996-3306 Application No. 08/145,380 applied to claims 1-12 is unclear. Nevertheless, given our conclusion that a prima facie case of obviousness has not been established for the claimed method irrespective of the level of peroxide (e.g., claim 1), our conclusion is not affected by what Mack discloses. The decision of the examiner is reversed. REVERSED ) SHERMAN D. WINTERS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT WILLIAM F. SMITH ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) HUBERT C. LORIN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007