THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JÜRGEN EICHLER, REINHARD KRUMBÖCK,
WENZEL KÜHN, PETER SCHWARZMAIER, THOMAS WILD,
RUDOLF SPIELMANNLEITNER, MANFRED STÖGER,
and INGOLF MIELKE
____________
Appeal No. 1996-3367
Application No. 08/480,554
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, PAK, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1-10 and 13, which are all of the claims
pending in this application.
BACKGROUND
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007