THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 10
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KONSTANTINOS KOURTAKIS, HORACIO E. BERGNA,
GEORGE C. SONNICHSEN, DAVID R. CORBIN and
LOREN D. BRAKE
____________
Appeal No. 1996-3493
Application No. 08/451,697
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before WINTERS, GARRIS, and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges.
SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims
1 through 6 and 17, which are all of the claims pending in this application. Claim 1 is illustrative:
1. An attrition resistant catalyst composition comprising one or more acidic
zeolites selected from the group consisting of rho and chabazite;
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007