Appeal No. 1996-3504 Application No. 08/265,648 USPQ 366, 367 (Bd. App. 1974). Accordingly, we cannot sustain the rejection of claims 5 and 35 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over the combined disclosures of Leif and Schrader. In view of the foregoing, the decision of the examiner is reversed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). REVERSED EDWARD C. KIMLIN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT BRADLEY R. GARRIS ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) CHUNG K. PAK ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 10Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007