Ex parte FELDSTEIN et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1996-3535                                                        
          Application No. 08/236,006                                                  

               The subject matter on appeal relates to a process for                  
          electrolessly metallizing a body to provide on the surface                  
          thereof a metal coating incorporating therein particulate                   
          matter which comprises contacting the surface of the body with              
          an electroless metallizing bath which contains a particulate                
          matter stabilizer that shifts the Zeta potential for the                    
          particulate matter by at least 10 mv.  Further details of this              
          appealed subject matter are set forth in representative                     
          independent claim 20 which reads as follows:                                
               20. A process for electrolessly metallizing a body to                  
          provide on the surface thereof a metal coating incorporating                
          therein particulate matter which comprises contacting the                   
          surface of said body with an electroless metallizing bath                   
          comprising an aqueous solution of a metal salt, a reducing                  
          agent, a quantity of insoluble particulate matter and a                     
          quantity of particulate matter stabilizer, wherein said                     
          particulate matter stabilizer shifts the Zeta potential for                 
          said insoluble particulate matter by at least 10 mv in                      
          comparison to the measured Zeta potential of said insoluble                 
          particulate matter alone in water.                                          
               The references set forth below are relied upon by the                  
          examiner as evidence of obviousness:                                        
          Metzger et al.                3,617,363                Nov.  2,             
          1971                                                                        
          Kurosaki et al.               3,787,294                Jan. 22,             
          1974                                                                        
               All of the appealed claims are rejected under the first                
          paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112 as being based upon a disclosure               
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007