Ex parte PATEL et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  
                                                            Paper No. 24              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                      Ex parte INDRAJIT PATEL, HAROLD BOWERMAN,                       
                           LARRY ROSENBAUM, RICH MENNENOH                             
                                    and PAT RYAN                                      
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 1996-3582                                  
                               Application 07/828,083                                 
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    

          Before CAROFF, KIMLIN and WARREN, Administrative Patent                     
          Judges.                                                                     
          CAROFF, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This decision on appeal relates to the final rejection of              
          claims 1-13.  Claims 14-15, all the other claims remaining in               
          appellants’ application, stand withdrawn from consideration as              
          being drawn to non-elected inventions and, thus, are not                    

                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007