THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte WILLIAM C. SETZER, RICHARD J. MALLLIRIS,
GARY W. BOONE, FRANK P. KOCH and DAVID K. YOUNG
______________
Appeal No. 1996-3587
Application 08/401,043
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, WARREN and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on Appeal and Opinion
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner refusing to allow
claims 1, 31 through 46, 49, 51 through 60 and 70 through 72 as amended subsequent to the final
rejection.1
We have carefully considered the record before us, and based thereon, find that we cannot
sustain the sole ground of rejection of the appealed claims advanced on appeal under 35 U.S.C. §
1Amendment of December 6, 1995 (Paper No. 10).
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007