THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 33
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte CARLTON E. ASH
and JON F. GEIBEL
__________
Appeal No. 1996-3724
Application 08/120,305
__________
REHEARING
__________
Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH, and GARRIS, Administrative
Patent Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
This is in response to a request, filed August 2, 1999,
for rehearing/reconsideration of our decision, mailed May 28,
1999, wherein we sustained the examiner’s section 103
rejections of the appealed claims as being unpatentable over
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007