Appeal No. 1996-3729 Application No. 08/253,839 facie case of obviousness which is not outweighed by evidence relied upon by appellants. Accordingly, we shall affirm the rejection at issue. As noted by the examiner, Saito discloses polyamide compositions inclusive of appellants' claimed formulation. Thus, the polyamide resin in the Saito composition may include a polyphthalamide. Additionally, the Saito composition contains a modified block copolymer. Appellants acknowledge in their Brief (page 6) that the modified block copolymer component of Saito is inclusive of appellants' succinic anhydride-functionalized block copolymer. Also, Saito contemplates inclusion of other components and, in particular, fillers and reinforcement materials (column 7, lines 61-65). We have little doubt that those of ordinary skill in the art would have found it prima facie obvious to include glass or carbon fibers in the Saito composition, as recited in appellants' claims, inasmuch as such fibers are conventionally used in the art as fillers or reinforcing agents as evidenced by Taubitz and Koch. Appellants argue that they have supplied data to demonstrate that addition of modified block copolymers to 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007