Ex parte TAVERNIER et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      

               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
               today (1) was not written for publication in a law                     
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the                        
               Board.                                                                 
                                                               Paper No. 16           
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    ____________                                      
                  Ex parte SERGE M. TAVERNIER, ROBERT F. JANSSENS,                    
                     LEO B. ALAERTS and HANS K. VAN CAUWENBERGHE                      
                                    ____________                                      
                                 Appeal No. 96-3803                                   
                             Application No. 08/128,245                               
                                    ____________                                      
                              HEARD: February 10, 2000                                
                                    ____________                                      
          Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH, and GARRIS, Administrative                    
          Patent Judges.                                                              
          KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        


               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 10-               
          17, all the claims remaining in the present application.  A                 
          copy of illustrative claim 10 is appended to this decision.                 
               In the rejection of the appealed claims, the examiner                  
          relies upon the following references:                                       
          Imai et al. (Imai)            4,741,984           May  03, 1988             
          Aita                               4,868,085           Sep. 19,             
          1989                                                                        





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007