THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 16 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte SERGE M. TAVERNIER, ROBERT F. JANSSENS, LEO B. ALAERTS and HANS K. VAN CAUWENBERGHE ____________ Appeal No. 96-3803 Application No. 08/128,245 ____________ HEARD: February 10, 2000 ____________ Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH, and GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judges. KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge. This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 10- 17, all the claims remaining in the present application. A copy of illustrative claim 10 is appended to this decision. In the rejection of the appealed claims, the examiner relies upon the following references: Imai et al. (Imai) 4,741,984 May 03, 1988 Aita 4,868,085 Sep. 19, 1989Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007