Ex parte GUNNERMAN - Page 7


                Appeal No. 1996-3826                                                                                                          
                Application 08/222,477                                                                                                        

                type aqueous fuels falling within the claimed oil-in-water type aqueous fuels encompassed by appealed                         
                claim 1 to one of ordinary skill in this art (Office action of June 1, 1995 (Paper No. 11, page 2);                           
                answer, sequential page 2.5 to page 5).  It is well settled that in considering the effect of a reference, we                 
                must consider the specific teachings thereof and the inferences one of ordinary skill in this art would                       
                reasonably be expected to draw therefrom.  In re Fritch, 972 F.2d 1260, 1264-65, 23 USPQ2d                                    
                1780, 1782-83 (Fed. Cir. 1992); In re Preda, 401 F.2d 825, 826, 159 USPQ 342, 344 (CCPA                                       
                1968).  Thus, the definition of a term or the meaning of a phrase in a reference must be construed within                     
                the context of the reference as interpreted by one of ordinary skill in this art.  See In re Salem, 553                       
                F.2d 676, 682-83, 193 USPQ 513, 518 (CCPA 1977).  In evaluating the relevance of the various                                  
                teachings of the reference, we must presume skill on the part of those of ordinary skill in this art.  See In                 
                re Sovish, 769 F.2d 738, 743, 226 USPQ 771, 774 (Fed. Cir. 1985).                                                             
                         We find that Kawaai would have reasonably disclosed a stable, oil-in-water type emulsified fuel                      
                containing “70-85% by weight of water, and alcohol if needed, as a continuous phase,” “15-30% by                              
                weight of liquid oil as a dispersed phase” and “0.001-10% by weight of a surface active agent for the                         
                formation of an oil-in-water emulsion,” that can be spray-combusted in a furnace (pages 2-3; see also                         
                page 4).  Kawaai would also have further reasonably disclosed that a similar “an oil-in-water type                            
                emulsified fuel containing 30-70% by weight of water, irrespective of the kind of oil . . . [which] can be                    
                combusted” was also known (page 3). Thus, one of ordinary skill in this art would have reasonably                             
                inferred from Kawaai that stable, oil-in-water type emulsified fuels that contain the ingredients taught in                   
                this reference would be obtained with less than 70 weight percent of water.6                                                  
                         We find that Kawaai teaches that the surfactant can be nonionic and that the stable, oil-in-water                    
                type emulsified fuel can further contain a stabilizer and a neutralizer (pages 4-5).  Kawaai would have                       
                                                                                                                                              
                6  Kawaai cites Japanese “Patent Application No. 47-108255” with respect to emulsified fuels                                  
                containing 30-70% by weight of water. We observe that U.S. Patent No. 5,156,114 to appellant, cited                           
                in the specification, also discloses aqueous fuels containing about 20 to 80 vol.% of water, a mixture of                     
                an alcohol and carbonaceous fuels, and optionally a surfactant (e.g., cols. 1-4 and 11-13). We suggest                        
                that any further prosecution of the appealed claims before the examiner should include consideration of                       
                applicable patent literature based on said application cited by Kawaai and of the ‘114 patent which                           



                                                                    - 7 -                                                                     



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007