Paper No. 24 THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex parte HANS O. CEDERBLAD and JAN D. SEPPALA ______________ Appeal No. 1996-3939 Application 08/295,6351 _______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before WINTERS, WILLIAM F. SMITH, and ROBINSON, Administrative Patent Judges. WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 1 through 25. 1Application for patent filed August 26, 1994. According to appellants, this application is a 371 of PCT/US92/01663, filed February 28, 1992. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007