The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte Liza M. Monette, Arnold Lustiger, Michael P. Anderson, John P. Dismukes, H. Daniel
Wagner, Cary N. Marzinsky, and Russell R. Mueller
________________
Appeal No. 1996-3974
Application 08/198,808
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge,
HARKCOM, Vice Chief Administrative Patent Judge, and
WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
Per Curiam.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims
19-23 and 25, all of the claims in the application. The claimed invention is directed to a
computer-implemented method for making a composite, incorporating a fiber, a matrix and an
interphase, that has optimum properties. Claim 19, the only independent claim, is reproduced at
page 11 of the brief.
The following reference is relied on by the examiner:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007