Appeal No. 1996-3982
Application No. 08/315,005
DECISION
The rejection of claims 1, 2, 6 through 15 and 18 through 26 under
35 U.S.C. § 112, paragraph two, as being indefinite for failing to point out and
distinctly claim the subject matter applicant’s regards as the invention is reversed.
The rejection of claims 23 and 24 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as
the specification as originally filed does not support the invention as now claimed is
affirmed.
The rejection of claims 1, 2, 6, 7, 9 through 15 and 18 through 26 under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Felder in view of Zosel is reversed.
The rejection of claims 1, 2, 6 through 15, and 18 through 26 under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Lane in view of Zosel is reversed.
The decision of the examiner is affirmed-in-part.
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007