Ex parte FORTIN - Page 4




                 Appeal No. 1996-4071                                                                                     Page 4                        
                 Application No. 08/292,692                                                                                                             


                          The prior art references of record relied upon by the                                                                         
                 examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                                                                                         
                 Great Britain Patent (GB ‘830)                                 991,830                    May  12, 1965                                
                 Fagence                                                                                                                                
                 Japanese Patent (JP ‘817)                                      56-16817                            Dec. 18,                            
                 19811                                                                                                                                  
                 Takeuchi et al.                                                                                                                        
                 Japanese Patent (JP ‘824)                                      59-78824                            May  07,                            
                 19822                                                                                                                                  
                 Yamada et al.                                                                                                                          

                          Claim 1 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                                                                        
                 unpatentable over JP ‘824 or JP ‘817 in view of GB ‘830.                                                                               


                                                                     OPINION                                                                            
                          Having carefully considered all of the arguments and                                                                          
                 evidence advanced by appellant and the examiner, we find                                                                               
                 ourselves in agreement with appellant that the examiner has                                                                            




                          1All subsequent reference in this opinion to JP '817 is a                                                                     
                 reference to the English language translation of the Japanese                                                                          
                 laid-open application of record.                                                                                                       
                          2All subsequent reference in this opinion to JP '824 is a                                                                     
                 reference to the English language translation of the Japanese                                                                          
                 laid-open application of record.                                                                                                       







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007