THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MICHAEL MODELL,
EVAN F. KUHARICH, and MICHAEL R. ROONEY
____________
Appeal No. 1996-4174
Application No. 08/134,204
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before GARRIS, WARREN, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's refusal
to allow claims 14-27 as amended after the final rejection,
which are all of the claims pending in this application.1
1The examiner states in the advisory action mailed on
March 21, 1995 (Paper no. 12) that the amendment filed by
appellant on February 21, 1995 (Paper no. 10) will be entered.
The amendment has not been clerically entered, as required.
This matter should be addressed upon return of the application
to the examiner.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007