Ex parte MODELL et al. - Page 1

                                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                        

                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written                                                      
                    for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                     
                                                                                                                    Paper No. 20                        
                                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                      
                                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                       
                                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                                         
                                                        Ex parte MICHAEL MODELL,                                                                        
                                          EVAN F. KUHARICH, and MICHAEL R. ROONEY                                                                       
                                                           Appeal No. 1996-4174                                                                         
                                                      Application No. 08/134,204                                                                        
                                                                      ON BRIEF                                                                          
                 Before GARRIS, WARREN, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                        
                 KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                    

                                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                         
                          This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's refusal                                                                      
                 to allow claims 14-27 as amended after the final rejection,                                                                            
                 which are all of the claims pending in this application.1                                                                              

                          1The examiner states in the advisory action mailed on                                                                         
                 March 21, 1995 (Paper no. 12) that the amendment filed by                                                                              
                 appellant on February 21, 1995 (Paper no. 10) will be entered.                                                                         
                 The amendment has not been clerically entered, as required.                                                                            
                 This matter should be addressed upon return of the application                                                                         
                 to the examiner.                                                                                                                       

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007