Ex parte TERRELL et al. - Page 3


                     Appeal No. 1997-0006                                                                                                                                              
                     Application 08/409,946                                                                                                                                            



                                The references relied on by the examiner are:                                                                                                          
                     Tamura et al. (Tamura)                                4,443,528                                             Apr. 17, 1984                                         
                     Kobata et al. (Kobata)                                           5,204,200                                            Apr. 20, 1993                               
                                The examiner has rejected appealed claims 1 through 11 and 14 through 19 under          35                                                             
                     U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Tamura view of Kobata.  We affirm.                                                                                        
                                Rather than reiterate the respective positions advanced by the examiner and appellants, we                                                             
                     refer to the examiner’s answer and to appellants’ principal and reply briefs for a complete exposition                                                            
                     thereof.                                                                                                                                                          
                                                                                     Opinion                                                                                           
                                We have carefully reviewed the record on this appeal and based thereon find ourselves in                                                               
                     agreement with the examiner that the claimed electrophotographic recording material encompassed by                                                                
                     appealed claim 1 would have been obvious over the combined teachings of Tamura and Kobata to one                                                                  
                     of ordinary skill in this art at the time the claimed invention was made.                                                                                         
                                As an initial matter, we must determine the invention encompassed by appealed claim 1 as it                                                            
                     stands before us, mindful that we must give the broadest reasonable interpretation to the terms of the                                                            
                     appealed claim consistent with appellants’ specification as it would be interpreted by one of ordinary                                                            
                     skill in this art.  See In re Morris, 127 F.3d 1048, 1054-55, 44 USPQ2d 1023, 1027 (Fed. Cir.                                                                     
                     1997).  The use of the transitional term “comprising” opens the claimed electrophotographic recording                                                             
                     material to the inclusion of any additional materials and layers in any amount.  Exxon Chemical                                                                   
                     Patents Inc. v. Lubrizol Corp., 64 F.3d 1553, 1555, 35 USPQ2d 1801, 1802 (Fed. Cir. 1995)                                                                         
                     (“The claimed composition is defined as comprising - meaning containing at least - five specific                                                                  
                     ingredients [emphasis supplied].”); In re Baxter, 656 F.2d 679, 686-87, 210 USPQ 795, 802-03                                                                      
                     (CCPA 1981) (“As long as one of the monomers in the reaction is propylene, any other monomer may                                                                  
                     be present, because the term ‘comprises’ permits the inclusion of other steps, elements, or materials.”).                                                         
                     We further find that the term “containing” used in the definition of the “photosensitive recording layer”                                                         
                     has the same effect as the transitional term “comprising.”  Exxon, supra; In re Panagrossi, 277 F.2d                                                              
                     181, 185, 125 USPQ 410, 413 (CCPA 1960).  This transitional term opens the “photosensitive                                                                        

                                                                                        - 3 -                                                                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007