Ex parte HEISLER et al. - Page 1

                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  
                                                            Paper No. 28              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                             Ex parte MANFRED HEISLER,                                
                                   FRIDOLIN STARY,                                    
                                    RUDOLF RATKA                                      
                                 and ALOIS SCHLIERF                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 1997-0009                                  
                               Application 08/074,819                                 
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    

          Before CAROFF, OWENS and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.               
          CAROFF, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This appeal is from the examiner’s final rejection of                  
          claims 1-10, all the claims pending in appellants’                          
          application.                                                                
               The claims are directed to a process for the continuous                

                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007