THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 36
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOHN O. G. VIETH
____________
Appeal No. 1997-0017
Application No. 08/188,365
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON and DIXON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1,
2, 4, 9, 10, 12 through 14, 16 and 17. In an Amendment After
Final (paper number 27), all of the claims were amended.
The disclosed invention relates to a method and system
for compressing non-transposed data.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007