THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not
written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte GREGORY A. BLUM and GEDALY LEVIN
____________
Appeal No. 1997-0058
Application No. 08/300,399
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, JERRY SMITH, and GROSS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1, 2, 5, 6, 8, 11 through 13, 16, and 17.
Claims 3, 4, 7, 9, 10, 14, and 15 stand objected to as being
dependent from a rejected base claim.
Appellants' invention relates to a circuit that reduces
in a current sense signal the leading edge current spike that
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007