Ex parte CUNNINGHAM et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
               today (1) was not written for publication in a law                     
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                 
                                                               Paper No. 17           


                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                  ________________                                    
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                  ________________                                    
                Ex parte MICHAEL F. CUNNINGHAM, RICHARD P.N. VEREGIN,                 
                CARL P. TRIPP, THOMAS E. ENRIGHT, MARIA V. McDOUGALL                  
                                and JOHN A. CREATURA                                  
                                  ________________                                    
                                Appeal No. 1997-0135                                  
                             Application No. 08/308,223                               
                                  ________________                                    
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                  ________________                                    
          Before KIMLIN, ELLIS and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.               
          KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        


                                REQUEST FOR REHEARING                                 
               This is in response to appellants' paper of July 19,                   
          1999, entitled "Petition for Reconsideration."                              
               Appellants do not request that we modify our decision of               
          June 15, 1999, wherein we sustained some of the examiner's                  
          rejections under 35 U.S.C.  112, in any way.  Rather,                      
                                         -1-                                          




Page:  1  2  3  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007