THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte MICHAEL F. CUNNINGHAM, RICHARD P.N. VEREGIN,
CARL P. TRIPP, THOMAS E. ENRIGHT, MARIA V. McDOUGALL
and JOHN A. CREATURA
________________
Appeal No. 1997-0135
Application No. 08/308,223
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before KIMLIN, ELLIS and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
REQUEST FOR REHEARING
This is in response to appellants' paper of July 19,
1999, entitled "Petition for Reconsideration."
Appellants do not request that we modify our decision of
June 15, 1999, wherein we sustained some of the examiner's
rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 112, in any way. Rather,
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007