Appeal No. 1997-0142
Application No. 08/373,721
examiner has not even acknowledged the fact that the
appellant’s brief contains assertions of unexpected results.
Thus, on the record of this appeal, the appellant’s assertions
of nonobviousness have not been contested by the examiner and
thus must be accepted as persuasive.
For these reasons, we also cannot sustain the examiner’s
section 103 rejection over Farmer in view of Navratil.
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007