Ex parte HORNAMAN et al. - Page 1




               THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                           
               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was     
               not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding    
               precedent of the Board.                                                

                                                            Paper No. 16              


                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                              Ex parte E. CHRIS HORNAMAN                              
                                          AND                                         
                                    THOMAS S. JONES                                   
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 1997-0230                                 
                              Application No. 08/416,668                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     

          Before PAK, OWENS, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                 
          OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         


                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of               
          claims 1-13, which are all of the claims in the application.                
                                     THE INVENTION                                    
               Appellants claim methods for applying a pressure sensitive             







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007