Appeal No. 1997-0233 Page 13
Application No. 08/266,558
art. Even if the Edin reference is considered to be analogous
prior art (the appellants argue that it is not), the combined
teachings of the applied prior art would not have suggested a
vertical pressure sealing assembly as set forth in claim 1.
For the reasons set forth above, the decision of the
examiner to reject claims 1 to 3, 5 and 6 under 35 U.S.C. §
103 is reversed.
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007