THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today was not written for publication and is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte ROLF DHEIN, KNUD REUTER, LOTHAR BACKER,
JOACHIM PROBST, WERNER KUBITZA AND RAINER RETTIG
________________
Appeal No. 1997-0334
Application 08/211,6981
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before METZ, PAK and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
METZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner's refusal to allow claims 4 and 5, all the claims
remaining in the application.
Application for patent filed April 13, 1994. Filed1
pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 371 based on PCT/EP92/02373, filed
on October 15, 1992.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007