Appeal No. 1997-0347 Application 08/193,654 that Harvey's dancer roll 112 maintains a substantially constant drag on the label supply wheel 110 by means of brake 165. Thus, appellants conclude that Harvey teaches that the movement of dancer roll 153 in Harvey serves only to regulate and maintain constant tension on the web being metered, while Harvey provides no disclosure or suggestion that dancer roll 153 is capable of providing a pulling force on the web, much less a pulling force of 20% of the total driving force necessary to pull the web through the machine as required by the "wherein" clause of appealed claim 14. Based on a comparison of the somewhat similar geometric relationships shown by appellants' Figure 3 power dancer 108 and Harvey's Figure 8 spring-biased lever arm dancer roll 153 arrangement, the examiner's finding that Harvey's dancer roll 153 inherently provides some pulling force on the continuous web appears reasonable. However, since neither Harvey nor the examiner's "secondary reference" to Asghar, expressly teaches or 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007