Ex parte SNYDER et al. - Page 6




          Appeal No. 1997-0347                                                        
          Application 08/193,654                                                      



          that Harvey's dancer roll 112 maintains a substantially                     
          constant drag on the label supply wheel 110 by means of brake               
          165.  Thus, appellants conclude that Harvey teaches that the                
          movement of dancer roll 153 in Harvey serves only to regulate               
          and maintain constant tension on the web being metered, while               
          Harvey provides no disclosure or suggestion that dancer roll                
          153 is capable of providing a pulling force on the web, much                
          less a pulling force of 20% of the total driving force                      
          necessary to pull the web through the machine as required by                
          the "wherein" clause of appealed claim 14.                                  
                    Based on a comparison of the somewhat similar                     
          geometric relationships shown by appellants' Figure 3 power                 
          dancer 108 and Harvey's Figure 8 spring-biased lever arm                    
          dancer roll 153 arrangement, the examiner's finding that                    
          Harvey's dancer roll 153 inherently provides some pulling                   
          force on the continuous web appears reasonable.  However,                   
          since neither Harvey nor the examiner's "secondary reference"               
          to Asghar, expressly teaches or                                             




                                          6                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007