THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte TERRY V. FRIESEN,
JAMES J. HARRISON and WILLIAM R. RUHE, JR.
______________
Appeal No. 1997-0494
Application 08/275,860
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KIMLIN, METZ and WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on Appeal
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner finally rejecting
claims 1, 3 and 4. Claims 5 through 9 are also of record and have been allowed by the examiner.
Claim 1 is illustrative of the claims on appeal:
1. A lubricating oil composition comprising
(a) a major amount of an oil of lubricating viscosity;
(b) a minor amount of a carbonated sulfurized metal alkyl phenate and
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007