THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte JUN-MO YANG, and
WON-HO YUN
_____________
Appeal No. 1997-0523
Application 08/082,576
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before HAIRSTON, HECKER and LALL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
LALL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 to 1
14, all the pending claims in the application.
1An amendment after the final rejection was filed as
paper no. 7 and was entered into the record, see the second
advisory action, paper no. 10. As a result, the rejection
under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph was dropped, leaving
only the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as outstanding.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007