The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 34 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte LOUIS DISCHLER ____________ Appeal No. 1997-0529 Application No. 08/573,884 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, WILLIAM F. SMITH and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges. NASE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 18 to 21. Claim 17 has been allowed. Claims 1 to 16 have been canceled. We REVERSE.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007