THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 38
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte KEITH E. OLSON, THOMAS R. OAKES,
DANIEL N. TALLMAN and WILLIAM G. MIZUNO
______________
Appeal No. 1997-0545
Application 08/224,063
_______________
HEARD: June 5, 2000
_______________
Before PAK, WARREN and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on Appeal
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner finally rejecting
claims 92 through 102 and 104 through 113 and refusing to allow claim 103 as amended subsequent to
the final rejection. Claim 92 is illustrative of the claims on appeal:1
92. A process for manufacturing an improved solid cast alkaline composition, said process
comprising the steps of:
1 We have reproduced claim 92 as it stands of record in the amendment of January 17, 1995 (Paper
No. 25; page 2) wherein it includes the phrase “a alkali metal.”
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007