Ex parte WILLIAMS et al. - Page 1




                            THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                      

            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
            journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                            

                                                                             Paper No.15                      


                            UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                         

                                                 __________                                                   

                                 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                           
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                                 __________                                                   

                         Ex parte DANIEL E. WILLIAMS and ABRAHAM H. GHAPHERY                                  
                                                 __________                                                   

                                             Appeal No. 1997-0558                                             
                                             Application 08/013,813                                           
                                                 ___________                                                  

                                                  ON BRIEF                                                    
                                                 ___________                                                  

            Before HAIRSTON, HECKER, and FRAHM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                 

            FRAHM, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                               

                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 

                   Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiners’ final rejection of claims 1 to 26,

            which constitute all of the pending claims in the application before us on appeal.                

                                               BACKGROUND                                                     

                   The subject matter on appeal is directed to an active vehicle suspension control method and

            apparatus which senses an operating characteristic of a corner having an actuator, takes a difference

                                                      1                                                       





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007