Appeal No. 1997-0581 Application No. 08/168,549 aware of the types of reaction conditions that can be manipulated to form the claimed grafted copolymer, without adversely affecting the desired properties of the resulting product. Hence, we determine that the applied prior art as a whole would not have suggested the claimed process useful for forming the claimed grafted copolymer. Accordingly, we reverse the examiner’s decision rejecting claim 13 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. In view of the foregoing, the decision of the examiner is affirmed-in-part. 12Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007