THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 38 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte THEODORE F. LONGSHORE and WILLIAM P. DECLERCK ____________ Appeal No. 1997-0624 Application No. 08/303,556 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before LALL, DIXON, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges. DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 2, 4-10, 12, 13 and 18-21, which are all of the claims pending in this application. In the answer, the examiner allowed claims 12, 13 and 18-21 and objected to claims 9 and 10, therefore only claims 1, 2 and 4-8 remain on appeal for review. We AFFIRM.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007