The rejection of claim 27 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Martin as modified by Hopfenberg in view of Bugnon and further in view of Loch is reversed. The rejection of claim 27 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over each of Hopfenberg in view of Kamada or Hopfenberg as modified by Kamada in view of Bugnon, each as applied to claims 12, 19, 22, 24 and 26 and further in view of Loch is reversed The decision of the examiner is reversed. REVERSED CHUNG K. PAK ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT THOMAS A. WALTZ ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) PAUL LIEBERMAN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) lp 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007