THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte CHENGJIU, WU,
MICHAEL J. MCFARLAND
and KARL W. BEESON
_____________
Appeal No. 1997-0704
Application 08/324,855
______________
ON BRIEF/HEARD: MARCH 6, 2000
_______________
Before GARRIS, OWENS and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s refusal to allow claims 35, 37 through 48 and
51 through 54 as amended subsequent to the final rejection
(see the amendment dated Jan. 4, 1996, Paper No. 15, entered
as per the Advisory Action dated Jan. 23, 1996, Paper No. 16,
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007