Ex parte WU et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  
                                                            Paper No. 24              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                               Ex parte CHENGJIU, WU,                                 
                               MICHAEL J. MCFARLAND                                   
                                 and KARL W. BEESON                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 1997-0704                                  
                               Application 08/324,855                                 
                                   ______________                                     
                            ON BRIEF/HEARD: MARCH 6, 2000                             
                                   _______________                                    

          Before GARRIS, OWENS and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.               
          WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C.  134 from the                 
          examiner’s refusal to allow claims 35, 37 through 48 and                    
          51 through 54 as amended subsequent to the final rejection                  
          (see the amendment dated Jan. 4, 1996, Paper No. 15, entered                
          as per the Advisory Action dated Jan. 23, 1996, Paper No. 16,               
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007