Appeal No. 1997-0833 Application No. 08/363,438 patentability of the pending claims herein in light of Miller's disclosure in view of the disclosures of Blizzard. Respecting this issue, we note that counsel for appellants has indicated in the brief (unnumbered pages 4 and 5) that if Miller were considered as the "primary reference", Blizzard could be utilized as a "secondary reference" to "overcome the deficiencies" in Miller, because Blizzard "discloses pressure sensitive adhesive compositions wherein random copolymers" including styrene- butadiene rubbers, are crosslinked with organohydrogenpolysil- oxane to obtain an improved adhesive bond strength. Presumably, appellants' statement above is based at least in part on the disclosure by Blizzard at column 2, lines 2 through 5 that the adhesion to a substrate, as well as the cohesive strength of the pressure sensitive adhesive composition itself, can be improved by curing a pressure sensitive adhesive. Accordingly, in light of appellants' comments in the brief, the examiner should reevaluate the patentability of the claims herein in light of the relevant disclosures in Miller as "a primary reference" in view of the relevant disclosures in Blizzard, as a "secondary reference". 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007