THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte HIROSHI OYAMADA, HIROYUKI KOIDE,
GOH OGINO and HIDEO HIRASAWA
______________
Appeal No. 1997-0845
Application 08/284,902
_______________
On Brief
_______________
Before PAK, WARREN and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on Appeal and Opinion
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner refusing to allow
claims 1 and 2 as amended subsequent to the final rejection.1
We have carefully considered the record before us, and based thereon, find that we cannot
sustain either of the grounds of rejection of the appealed claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Powers
1 Amendments of June 10, 1996 (Paper No. 6) and June 25, 1996 (Paper No. 9)..
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007