THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 22 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte CHANDR SEKAR _____________ Appeal No. 1997-0870 Application No. 08/333,416 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before JOHN D. SMITH, WALTZ, and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judges. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's refusal to allow claims 11 through 22, 28 through 34, and 36 through 44, as amended subsequent to the final 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007