Appeal No. 1997-0915
Application 08/369,853
1966). Assuming, arguendo, that control signals were well
known, the Examiner has not shown that sending control signals
from the data acquisition pod (sensor), as claimed, was known.
For the reasons stated above, the Examiner has failed to
establish a prima facie case of obviousness. The rejection of
claims 18 and 24 is reversed.
Claim 27
Claim 27 recites replacement of data in the portable
monitor memory with data stored in a remote display memory if
the data stored in the portable monitor memory are older than
the data in the remote display memory and transmitting data
stored in the portable monitor memory to the remote display
memory if the data stored in the remote display memory are
older than the data stored in the portable monitor memory. We
find no teaching or suggestion of these limitations in either
Policastro or Sasaki and we find the Examiner's rationale
unpersuasive. The Examiner has failed to establish a prima
facie case of obviousness. The rejection of claim 27 is
reversed.
- 15 -
Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007