THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte MICHAEL KAUSCH, KARL-HEINZ WOLF,
WOLFGANG KLEIN and KONRAD SCHMITZ
__________
Appeal No. 1997-0958
Application 08/300,669
___________
HEARD: February 8, 2000
___________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, OWENS, and LIEBERMAN, Administrative
Patent Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of
claims 10-18. Claims 19 and 20, which are the only other
claims remaining in the application, stand withdrawn from
consideration by the examiner as being directed toward a
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007