THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 12
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte DANIEL J. BATDORF
_________
Appeal No. 1997-0998
Application 08/251,4941
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before OWENS, WALTZ and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s refusal to allow claims 1 through 5, 9, 13 through
15 and 22 as amended subsequent to the final rejection (see2
1 Application for patent filed May 31, 1994.
2 As noted in the Answer, pages 2 and 3, claim 23 as presented by appellant in
the amendment dated Jan. 11, 1996, Paper No. 4, has been renumbered as claim 22 since
the claims as originally filed contained no claim 18.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007