The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 13 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte MAN C. TAM and EDWARD G. ZWARTZ _____________ Appeal No. 1997-1053 Application No. 08/432,291 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before GARRIS, WALTZ, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 32, which are all of the claims pending in this application. According to appellants, the invention is directed to a migration imaging process (specification, page 1). Illustrative claim 1 is reproduced and attached as an Appendix 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007