THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 23 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte WILHELM ENGST ____________ Appeal No. 1997-1122 Application No. 08/170,177 ____________ HEARD: March 08, 2000 ____________ Before GARRIS, OWENS, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's refusal to allow claims 14, 15, 17, 20, 22-32, and 34 as amended after the final rejection, which are all of the claims pending in this application. BACKGROUND Appellant's invention is directed to an absorption mat for hydrocarbons in liquid, solid or paste form. The mat includes a flat molded body of plate or block shape formed from elastomeric granulates or shavings that are joined in aPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007