THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 36
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte PETER O. REKOW, THOMAS W. HOLMQUIST-BROWN, DAVID L. BRAUN and
VAUGHN B. GRANNIS
____________
Appeal No. 1997-1155
Application No. 08/376,199
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, McQUADE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's refusal to allow claims 1-14, 16, 19-27
and 29, as amended (Paper No. 12) subsequent to the final rejection. Claims 18 and 28 were
canceled subsequent to the final rejection (see Paper No. 12), claims 15 and 17 stand allowed
and claims 30-34 stand withdrawn from further consideration under 37 CFR
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007