The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte DAVID E. EDGREN, HOWARD A. CARPENTER,
GURDISH K. BHATTI AND ATUL D. AYER
__________
Appeal No. 1997-1160
Application No. 08/036,566
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before, WINTERS, ADAMS, and MILLS, Administrative Patent Judges.
ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 24-27. We note that claim 23 was canceled in appellants’ after final
amendment1, therefore the examiner’s final rejection of claim 23 is not at issue in this
appeal.
1 Paper No. 15, received March 9, 1995.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007