THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 12
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte WALTER KOENIG
_____________
Appeal No. 1997-1164
Application 08/279,304
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before URYNOWICZ, HAIRSTON and DIXON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
through 8.
The disclosed invention relates to a liquid crystal
optical display.
Claims 1 and 2 are illustrative of the claimed invention,
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007