THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte ROBERT LIEBL, and
WOLFGANG PFAEHLER
_____________
Appeal No. 1997-1207
Application 08/272,590
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS and LALL, Administrative Patent Judges.
LALL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of all the 1
pending claims, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 9.
The disclosed invention pertains to a method of
1An amendment after the final rejection was filed [paper
no. 7] and was approved for entry by the Examiner [paper no.
8].
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007