Appeal No. 1997-1208
Application 08/077,219
process is needed with a target object located in the second
address space;
b) generating a proxy object in the first address space
corresponding to the target object, said generated proxy
object emulating said target object in the first address
space; and
c) establishing the communication link between the first
process and the target object through the proxy object.
The following references are cited in the Examiner’s
Answer:1
East et al. (East) 5,187,790 Feb. 16,
1993
Serlet et al. (Serlet) 5,481,721 Jan. 02,
1996
(Effectively filed Jul. 17,
1991)
Stein et al. (Stein) 5,497,463 Mar. 05,
1996
(Filed Sep. 25, 1992)
The rejections of the appealed claims are set forth by
the Examiner as follows:2
1 The Serlet and Stein references were cited by the
Examiner for the first time in the prosecution at page 10 of
the Answer. As indicated in the Supplemental Examiner’s
Answer, these references were cited “for the good of the
prosecution history”, but are not relied upon and form no
basis for the rejections in this application.
2 As indicated at page 3 of the Answer, the Examiner has
withdrawn the non-statutory subject matter rejection under 35
U.S.C. § 101.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007