The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte RAYMOND AUDENAERT, ALBAN HENNEN,
JOSEF SCHMOLL and HEINZ GOLLER
_____________
Appeal No. 1997-1218
Application 08/268,687
______________
HEARD: October 11, 2000
_______________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, KRATZ and TIMM, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
final rejection of claims 5 through 7 and 14, all of the
claims remaining in the application.
The subject matter on appeal relates to a method for
producing milled glass fibers which are distinguished by high
apparent densities coupled with correspondingly large average
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007